You can get three points for every category :

Impression (How does the site take effect with the first click? What bothers? What's good? Is it harmonic?)
3 points, adapted layout for the subject, consice, good readable, not a standard…. Definite right and full score.

Clearness (How good and fast do you detect rightly on the site? How does the menu look like?)
3 points, the menu is consiced, it's always viewable at the border. In the gallery you can see how many pictures are online, it's clearly partitioned. The undersides are clearly partitioned, too. With breaks and co. The only thing you can difficult decollate is "Which of these things would you prefer ?"... there it's cursive and so not always obvious. It would be better to underline the word or made a star after it or not writting fat!

Originality (Can you find something on the site wich you couldn't find often in the internet? How fancy is the site built? Are the texts self writed? How fancy is the layout? )
2 points: You've got a nice and fancy layout for the site, great pictures... What we miss are the fancy subheads e.g. about Duane, or the text about his biography isn't really fancy. You know it from the programms and so.

Multifariousness (Either: The site is about many themes, or: If it's a website with only one theme, how manifold are the subthemes? Sites like: Guestbook, Links, Home, Banner, Forum, Imprint are not counted, cause we think that this subsites belong to every website)
3 points. You've got some subcategories… And then subsites again. That's great! Full score

Functionality (Does the links, pictures, banners work?)
3 points - no red x! Not a construction site! Super, full score!

Entertainmentvalue (Do you stay a long time on the site? Is it fun to be on this site? Do you feel good? Have you got fun?)
3 points.. Intrinsic is the site gorgeous seen and you enjoy the visit. Pictures and texts take turns.It's a pity, that there is such a big copyright on the picuters of Duane! deed we know, that you have got problems with photo theft.... But it makes the pictures unlovely. It would be nicer if there is only a little copyright beside the head instead of a big thing on the whole photo. Sometimes there are also two copyrights on a photo... It's too bad.

Informationvalue (Do you get lots of infos about the theme, webmaster or what about the website is? Is the information current? Are there information that are find everywhere in the internet?)
2 points. Hm, we miss more details about Duane. His biography is very short, there isn't a "homestory" or so. The description is super long and with fancy questions, too (smile, some we know, because we asked some of them to some actors in 1996 e.g. - thrill or kill,be glad or be regret).

Up-to-dateness (When was the last update? How corrent are the themes? Does a update site exist on that you can see how often the site is administed? When was something changed/added?
3 points : ... Full score again. Super, you do a lot on the site... We think it would be consiser if the news of Duane and the news of the website are separate. Either color-coordinated or with two rubrics. Because if you are looking for news about Duane, you must read all website news, too. There we would find it better if on NEWS you've got 2 subsites again "Duane news" and "website news". But all in all it's great.

Awardarea (How lovely and detailely is this area created? Are the won awards presented "condign"? Do you lend out awards, too? If it's this case, which rules exist and how look the awards like?)
0 Points… Sorry, laugh, you wrote something about it on the registration. Hm, on the one hand we know that problem. On the other hand we can't estimate something that isn't there (it would be unfair to the others). We can't also "estimate" how you imagine this rubric. If it will be separate… There aren't any appendages. But await the final total. Anyway the rubric with the bonuspoints exist…. ;-) And till now it looks great!

Overall impression (How does the site affect to the visitors (to us)?)
3 points: A site which you regard willingly. Where you can see a lot and where you have to read a lot. Here you feel good and you come by often. It creates lust to see more. Keep at it! Full score!

Specials/Bonuspoints (This is a alternative to get bonuspoints to balance other areas. Is there something special? Something nice? Something exceeding? This can give bonuspoints! (But without these bonuspoints you can get a goldaward, too!)
2 points, for the fanarea with the nice ideas, that there the fans can save the photos on their computers, for the brilliant layout and for the super photos.