Psychology and Economics  Part 1d

Volker Wegener   ,    31 Mar 2013

Part 1        Part 1a       Part 1b       Part 1c    Part1d      Part 1e       Part 2     Part 2a     Part 2b     Part 2c     Part 3       Photos of Volker Wegener    

You are allowed to put a link to this website on your own website, as networking to be less dependent on search engines.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCCUPY WALL STREET:
NEW:  The start of a new growing worldwide social movement "Occupy Wall Street" (99% against 1%, against greed, corruption and inequality) since 17 Sep 2011 ( much in search engines and on Twitter): 
http://occupywallst.org/  , http://www.occupytogether.org/   ,  http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/  ,  http://anonops.blogspot.com/  ,   http://rt.com/usa/podcasts/  , OccupyWallStreet  , http://www.breakingcopy.com/tag/newspaper  ,  https://twitter.com/#!/LucyKafanov  , http://english.pravda.ru/society/stories/20-09-2011/119095-wost_enemy-0/  , http://pub.mathaba.net/2011/10/19/occupy-what-a-guide-to-real-change/  , the best video on Occupy the World (double standards: USA and Arab countries): http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=S880UldxB1o&noredirect=1#!  , US mainstream media celebrate the demonstraters in the "Arab spring"as heroes, but when the same is done in the "American autumn" the US mainstream media mock them (double standard). , http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/10/24/totally-corrupt-america/ , http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/03/24/truth-has-fallen-and-taken-liberty-with-it/  , http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution  ,  http://occupydaysofaction.com/act/resources.html  , http://www.occupyaipac.org/  ,  http://ampedstatus.com/  ,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://mathaba.net/(Libya)  ,   PressTV(Iran)  ,  PressTV can partly also be received on:  http://www.youtube.com/user/PressTVGlobalNews#p/a   ,  https://twitter.com/#!/PressTVchannel  , http://english.irib.ir ,
CNTV English(China)  ,  with browsers Internet Explorer 8 und Firefox 3: CCTV-News (click: new loading)  ,  CNTV English(CCTV Live as P2P) ,  http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2011/03/hillary-clinton-us-losing-information-war-alternative-media  ,  http://www.businessinsider.com/extended-exposure-to-fox-news-may-be-detrimental-to-your-intelligence-2010-12  ,

The U.S.A. is often called the number 1 country of double standards(hypocrisy): What is a double standard? A double standard or a double moral standard means that one country is usually being condemned for the slightest offense while the other country is treated far more leniently. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Western countries" means the same as Pentagon-countries (NATO-countries). "Western countries" is a PR-expression(public relations) for Pentagon-countries. It is possible to add additional Western countries "in the West" and "Western countries" does not sound so militaristic". The NATO countries often call themselves "the international community". The other countries are called "non-Western" or non-Pentagon (non-NATO) countries. Pentagon is the symbol of U.S.A. military might.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On war reporting, mass media manipulate, censor, and lie very massively, i.e. by PR , public relations, methods.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Color Revolution:
http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=3151  ,  http://rt.com/news/us-lies-libya-laden-crane/   ,  http://www.voltairenet.org/article169874.html  ,
In Libya, most of the population was for Gaddafi. In Syria, it is similar. But the US wants to conquer other countries. In Libya it looks like to become as in Afghanistan, Iraq and Somalia.   http://killinghope.org/  ,
From the beginning, I had thought that the events in early 2011 in the Arab world, as in Egypt and Tunisia, were color revolutions (colour revolutions). Now at the end of May 2011, many of the alternative media also have come to the same conclusion. Preparation plus opportunity sometimes equals success. The U.S.A. normally prepare a war of conquest mostly very many years in advance, and claim that the other country has no freedom and  democracy and no human rights (double standards, Occupy Wall Street). By threatening other countries, the U.S.A. causes in these other countries less democracy, less freedom and fewer human rights. Color revolutions are part of imperialism, i.e. the rule of one country over another country. Imperialism means the dictatorship of one country over other countries and totalitarianism. Color revolutions are like psychological warfare. Color revolutions (colour revolutions) are a simple application of public relations (PR). It is similar to election campaigns, wars, and on a smaller scale to mobbing. For color revolutions (colour revolutions) you need a lot of money, e.g. for money to the heads of large organizations in a country and you need money for consultants. You need to prepare for years. Color Revolutions (colour revolutions) are planned, organized and financed by the United States. National Endowment for Democracy in the U.S. (NED) and political foundations of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party of the United States. Helped by countries that are dependent on the U.S., like Germany, especially the political party foundations have experience in it. The color revolutions save the U.S. costs of war. Color revolutions, the U.S. has done frequently in recent years, eg in Honduras, Haiti, Ukraine, Georgia, Lebanon, Kosovo, Russia. If no color revolutions are possible, then, the U.S. makes wars as in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan. The rulers of the to be conquered countries, in the opinion of the U.S., do take too much money for themselves, instead the super rich of the U.S. want to have this money for themselves. For disciplining the political parties in the interest of the profit interests of the super rich, the super rich need at least two parties for giving them their different amounts of money contributions; the party which gets the most money, does win the elections in 96% of cases. New permanent U.S. military bases in oil countries. The United States does determine which country in the future still does get how much oil. During the color revolutions the people through the media (public relations) are told time and again, that people should fight against a dictator and for freedom and democracy. Repetitions in the media and the parroting the media are very often. If  color revolutions are successful, the population is then brought into deep poverty and misery.
The previous U.S. President Bush even during his time in office wanted to do regime change in the Arab countries (color revolutions). President Obama had said that he does not want to determine who the future Egyptian head of state will be. The color revolution in Tunisia is called Jasmine Revolution and  the color revolution in Egypt Lotus Revolution. These are the kind of names which the U.S.A. uses for its color revolutions. The German party foundations in early 2011 were very active in Egypt to influence. The German mass media cheer in 2011 on the revolutions against dictators in the Arab world and that these revolutions would bring freedom and democracy. The jubilation in the German media is as strong as when the wars against Yugoslavia and Iraq began. About the strong  impoverishment of the population after a successful color revolutions, the media of course are silent. The activists of the color revolutions in some of the Arab countries are said to use Aljazeera as propagandea channel and Facebook for communication. The color revolutions are in no way against the U.S.A. Future IMF money payments are to make Arab countries more dependent on the  U.S.A. (debt slavery). The military in Egypt is pro U.S.A, the U.S. does pay billions of  U.S. dollars to the Egyptian governments, especially for weapons. The three countries which do get the most money from the U.S.A., are Israel, Egypt and Turkey (near the oil).
Young people (under 25) and students can be manipulated more easily. They are for example almost completely naive as to what public relations (PR) is. Among the people the belief is generated that the movement is from below, ie emanates from the people, spontaneously. In reality the movement, however, is controlled completely from the top in every detail (preparation, organization, funding, funds distribution, media manipulation, techniques of propaganda and persuasion). By the 'the top' I mean the large banks, financial institutions, large corporations, the super rich who want to increase their profits and money faster, or a part of the big banks, big corporations, the super rich, or their public relations organizations. For public relations to be most effective, the population must not be informed that public relations is applied. Foreign journalists are particularly suited to start a color revolution in anothe country. The top people for goverining a country after a color revolution have been trained and stayed in the U.S.A. for many years. The organizers pay special attention to the fact that "extremists" gain no influence during a color revolution. By extremists, I mean people who might reduce the profits of the big banks, big corporations and the super-rich. On the other hand, there is also a possibility that progressive movements seek to have influence during color revolutions. What is the consequence of the a successful color revolution? A poverty as during the about 10 years after the end of the USSR in Russia (a contraction of the economic output to 1 / 6, to about the size of the economic performance of Belgium), or a situation like in Iraq e.g. during the year 2010, a decline in the economic development by more than 10 years. The ability to carry out a color revolution  in another country or to make a war in another country, nowadays does NOT mean at all that the conquered country can be dominated by the conquering country afterwards, especially not in the longer run. So that a color revolution or a war may have been in vain for the conquering country. Some groups, particularly Islamic groups believe to be able to influence the color revolutions in the Arab world for themselves. When will there be a color revolution in the U.S. itselff? There are enough  reasons for it. When will there be a coalition for a color revolution in the U.S.A? In a similar way, public relations often is used in the following scenario: There is an environmental movement number 1 financed and organized by the the people against a corporation. The corporation wants to fight the environmental movement number 1. So the corporation does make an own environmental movement number 2. The corporation fianances and organizes its envrionmental movement number 2 and uses much money to advertise it as made by the people themselves.

Color revolution (colour revolution, Farbrevolution, bunte Revolution):  "Dictators" do not Dictate, They Obey Orders(Chossudovsky)  ,  How the Empire Plays Both Cards  ,  Egypt Color Revolution (Engdahl, Tarpley)  ,  US Department of Imperial Expansion  ,  United Front Against Iran  ,  Color Revolution in Egypt?  ,  Another Soros "Color" Revolution  ,  Color Revolution(Wikipedia)  ,  Open Speech  ,  College of Coups  ,

How the U.S.A. tries to do damage to China by means of propaganda,etc., because China is an economic competitor to the U.S.A. Here the opposing views in comments and replies are extremely informative    ,  link 2   ,   link 3  ,

Here are the methods,  on how the U.S.A does do color revolutions(colour revolutions) in other countries of the world (imperialism):  Canvasopedia  ,    MOVEMENTS.ORG  ,  MOVEMENTS.ORG  2  ,  MOVEMENTS.ORG 3  ,   FREEDOMHOUSE  ,  The Albert Einstein Institution  ,

Activist Post   ,   Anglosphere Plots Color Revolutions Around the World?(the Daily Bell)   ,   link 2(Daily Paul)   ,   Against China and Islam  ,

Part 1        Part 1a        Part 1b        Part 1c    Part 1d       Part 1e       Part 2     Part 2a    Part 2b      Part 2c     Part 3

E-mail