All ( globalization , neoliberalism , inequality , poverty ,
social
justice , economic justice , progressive , democracy ) .
Part
1 Part
1a
Part
1b Part
1c Part
1d Part
2 Part
2a Part
2b Part
2c Part 3 Photos
of Volker Wegener
You are allowed to put a link to this website
on your own website, as networking to be less dependent on search
engines.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Details on myself are now at "the author of this website" on Part 2c of this website.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
22
THE MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ON THE INTERNET
I feel joy when it comes to my mind that there are women like the following women
whom I adore :
Adriana Arboleda ( ) ,
Adriana Fonseca ( ) ,
Adriana Lima ( Adriana Lima ) ,
Adriana Sklenarikova ( Adriana Karembeu )
Ai Katou ( ) ,
Aishwarya Rai ( ) ,
Alessandra Ambrosio ( ) ,
Alexandra Helmig ( ) ,
Alexandra Merino ( ) ,
Alexandra Paul ( ) ,
Ali Landry ( ) ,
Ali Larter ( ) ,
Alicia Silverstone ( )
Alison Armitage ( ) ,
Allegra Coleman ( ) ,
Almudena Fernandez ( Almudena Fernandez ) ,
Amada Rosa Pérez ( ) ,
Amber Valetta ( ) ,
Ana Claudia Michels ( ) ,
Ana Hickmann ( Ana Hickmann ) ,
Ana Paula Dutil ( ) ,
Anagha ( Anagha Fowler ) ,
Ananya Dutt ( Ananya Dutt ) ,
Andrea Guzman ( Andrea Guzman ) ,
Andrea López ( ) ,
Andrea Mejtova ( ) ,
Andrea Molina ( ) ,
Aneta Klaudova ( ) ,
Angela Lindvall ( )
Angela Prieto ( ) ,
Angela Vergara ( Angela Vergara ) ,
Angelica Pamintuan ( ) ,
Angelica Rivera ( Angelica Rivera ) ,
Angelie Almendare ( Angelie Almendare photos ) ,
Angelina Jolie ( Angelina Jolie ) ,
Angelly Moncayo ( ) ,
Angie Everhart ( )
Angie Harmon ( ) ,
Anja Kling ( ) ,
Anja Kruse ( ) ,
Anjum Sait ( Anjum Sait ) ,
Anna Kournikova ( ) ,
Anouck Lepere ( ) ,
Antonia Langsdorf ( ) ,
Anu Agarwal ( Anu Agarwal ) ,
Ariana Richards ( ) ,
Ariane Sommer ( ) ,
Ashley Judd ( Articles ) ,
Asuka Yanagi ( ) ,
Aurelie Claudel ( ) ,
Barbora Maliskova ( ) ,
Beatriz Ramirez ( Beatriz Ramirez ) ,
Bettina Zimmermann ( ) ,
Beverly Peele ( ) ,
Birgit Schrowange ( ) ,
Bobbi Billard ( Bobbi Billard ) ,
Brandi Carrier ( ) ,
Brandi Quinones ( ) ,
Bridget Hall ( )
Brigitte Bardot ( ) ,
Brittany Daniel ( Brittany Daniel ) ,
Brooke Burke ( Brooke Burke ) ,
Buffy Lawrence ( ) ,
Caprice Bourret ( Caprice Bourret ) ,
Carla Barzotti ( ) ,
Carlita Ochoa ( ) ,
Carol Grow ( ) ,
Carola de Bianco ( ) ,
Carole - Luxembourg ( ) ,
Carolina Sabino ( Carolina Sabino ) ,
Caroline Beil ( )
,
Carloyn Murphy ( ) ,
Carrie Fisher ( ) ,
Catalina Aristizabal ( Catalina Aristizabal ) ,
Catherine Fulop ( ) ,
Charisma Carpenter ( ) ,
Charmaine Sinclair ( * * * ) ,
Charlize Theron ( ) ,
Cheryl Tiegs ( ) ,
Chloe Jones ( ) ,
Christie Clark ( ) ,
Christina Maria Aguilera ( ) ,
Christine Döring ( ) ,
Christy Turlington ( ) ,
Cindy Crawford ( Cindy Crawford , Cindy Crawford , Cindy Crawford ) ,
Cindy Margolis ( ) ,
Claire Goose ( ) ,
Cordelia ( Cordelia's Fun Club , Cordelianews , ) ,
Cori Nadine ( ) ,
Cory Everson ( ) ,
Dagmar Liekens ( Leikens ) ( ) ,
Daisy Fuentes ( ) ,
Daniela Campos ( ) ,
Daniela Noack ( ) ,
Daniela Pestova ( Nocky's Daniela Pestova Gallery ) ,
Davina Taylor ( ) ,
Debbe Dunning ( ) ,
Denise Paglia ( ) ,
Désirée Nosbusch ( ) ,
Diana Hayden ( Diana Hayden ) ,
Diana Kovalchuk ( ) ,
Dido ( ) ,
Dipanita Sharma ( Dipanita Sharma ) ,
Donna D'Errico ( ) ,
Elizabeth Hurley ( ) ,
Elle Macpherson ( ) ,
Elsa Benitez ( ) ,
Emma Noble ( ) ,
Erika Rochane ( ) ,
Esther Schweins ( Esther Schweins ) ,
Estella Warren ( Estella Warren ) ,
Eugenia Silva ( ) ,
Eva Habermann ( Eva Habermann ) ,
Eva Padberg ( ) ,
Faith Hill ( ) ,
Fleur Xavier ( Fleur Xavier ) ,
Flora Martinez ( Flora Martinez ) ,
Franziska Reichenbacher ( Franziska Reichenbacher ) ,
Fumika Suzuki ( ) ,
Gabrielle Reece ( Gabrielle Reece ) ,
Gabrielle Richens ( ) ,
Gail Elliot ( ) ,
Gail Porter ( ) ,
Garcelle Beauvais ( ) ,
Gena Lee Nolin ( ) ,
Georgina Morgan-Grenville ( ) ,
Georgianna Robertson ( ) ,
Gigi Leung ( ) ,
Giane Albertoni ( ) ,
Gillian Bonner ( ) ,
Gina Wild ( ) ,
Gintaré - Luxembourg ( ) ,
Gitta Sack ( ) ,
Grace Kelly ( ) ,
Gwen Rogers ( ) ,
Harumi Inoue ( ) ,
Heather Locklear ( ) ,
Heidi Klum ( Heidi Klum Java needed ) ,
Henriette Richter-Röhl ( ) ,
Hila Brosis ( Hila Bronstein ) ,
Himani Rawat ( Himani Rawat ) ,
Hiroko Anzai ( ) ,
Ho Yan ( ) ,
Holly M. Combs ( Holly Marie Combs ) ,
Holly Valence ( Holly Valence ) ,
Hudson Leick ( ) ,
Ignacia Ihnen Senn ( ) ,
Ina Klink ( ) ,
Indira ( aka Verena Weiß , Verena Weiss ) ,
Ines Sastre ( ) ,
Inga Drozdova ( ) ,
Ingrid Poka ( ) ,
Ingrid Seynhaeve ( ) ,
Isabelle A ( ) ,
Isha Gopikar ( Isha
Gopikar ) , Isha Koppikar ,
Izabella Scorupco ( ) ,
Jaime Pressly ( Jaime Pressly , Jaime Pressly ) ,
Janet Jackson ( ) ,
Jennie Garth ( Jennie Garth ) ,
Jennifer Allen ( ) ,
Jennifer Lopez ( ) ,
Jenny Knight ( ) ,
Jenny Lopez ( ) ,
Jenny Mccarthy ( Jenny McCarthy ) ,
Jessica Alba ( ) ,
Jessica Biel ( Jessica Biel ) ,
Jessica Simpson ( Jessica Simpson ) ,
Jewel Kilcher ( Jewel Kilcher ) ,
Jin Sil Choi ( ) ,
Jiwoo Choi ( ) ,
Jo O'Meara ( ) ,
Jodie Low ( ) ,
Jodie Meares (
) ,
Joey Matthews ( Joey Matthews ) ,
Jolene Blalock ( ) ,
Jordana Brewster ( ) ,
Josie Maran ( ) ,
Judit Masco ( ) ,
Juhi Chawla ( ) ,
Julieta Garcia ( Juliet Garcia ) ,
Jun Matsuda ( ) ,
Jup Salakjit ( ) ,
Kamal Siddhu ( Kamal Siddhu ) ,
Kaori Ohara ( ) ,
Karen Bravo ( ) ,
Kari Salen ( ) ,
Karin Taylor ( ) ,
Karyn Parsons ( ) ,
Katarina Juristova ( ) ,
Kate Fischer ( ) ,
Kate Groombridge ( ) ,
Kate Hudson ( Kate Hudson ) ,
Kate Moss ( Kate Moss ) ,
Katherine Heigl ( ) ,
Kathleen Robertson ( ) ,
Kathy Ireland ( ) ,
Katia Alens ( ) ,
Keerthi Reddy ( Keerthi Reddy ) ,
Kei Hoshiko ( ) ,
Keira Knightly ( Keira Knightley ) ,
Kellie Martin ( ) ,
Kellie Williams ( ) ,
Kelly Emberg ( ) ,
Kelly Hu ( ) ,
Kelly Rutherford ( ) ,
Kendra Jade ( ) ,
Keri Russell ( ) ,
Kiana Tom ( ) ,
Kimberly Kelly ( ) ,
Kimika Yoshino ( ) ,
Kirsten Imrie aka Kirsten Stewart ( ) ,
Kirsten Dunst ( Kirsten Dunst ) , All ,
Kona Carmack ( ) ,
Kulada Zaire ( ) ,
Kylie Minogue ( ) ,
Kyoko Fukada ( ) ,
Lady Noriega ( ) ,
Laetitia Herrera ( ) ,
Larissa Bondarenko ( ) ,
Lark Voorhies ( ) ,
Laura Harring ( ) ,
Laura Mesas ( ) ,
Lauren Koslow ( ) ,
Lea Dylewitz ( ) ,
Leeann Tweeden ( ) ,
Lela Rochon ( Lela Rochon ) ,
Lexa Doig ( ) ,
Lil' Kim ( ) ,
Lilo Pulver ( Liselotte Pulver ) ,
Linda Carter ( ) ,
Linda de Mol ( ) ,
Linda O'neil ( ) ,
Linda Park ( ) ,
Linda Purl ( ) ,
Lisa Faulkner ( ) ,
Lisa Guerrero Coles ( ) ,
Lisa Hartman ( ) ,
Lisa Marie Scott ( ) ,
Lisa Methews ( ) ,
Lisa Raye ( ) ,
Liv Tyler ( Liv Tyler ) ,
LizWeekes ( ) ,
Lola Corwin ( ) ,
Lorena Di Mizio ( ) ,
Luciana Farfan ( ) ,
Lujan Fernandez ( ) ,
Lymraina D'Souza ( Lymraina D'Souza ) ,
Madhu Sapre ( Madhu Sapre ) ,
Maggie Rizer ( Maggie Rizer ) ,
Mahima(Ritu) Chaudhary ( Mahima(Ritu) Chaudhary ) ,
Malaika Arora ( Malaika Arora ) ,
Malvika Singh ( Malvika Singh ) ,
Mandy Moore ( Mandy Moore ) ,
Mar Flores ( ) ,
Margarita Corrales ( ) ,
Maria Bello ( ) ,
Maria Ines Rivero ( ) ,
Maria Vasquez ( ) ,
Marianella Maal ( Marianella Maal ) ,
Mariella Ahrens ( Mariella Ahrens ) ,
Mariel Ocampo ( ) ,
Mary Rodriguez ( ) ,
May Andersen ( ) ,
Meg Ryan ( ) ,
Melanie Sykes ( ) ,
Melanie Wichterich ( ) ,
Melisa Oberwise ( ) ,
Melissa Joan Hart ( ) ,
Melissa Kalway ( ) ,
Michelle Behennah ( ) ,
Michelle Dome ( ) ,
Michelle Phillips ( ) ,
Michelle Thomas ( ) ,
Michelle Weweje ( ) ,
Milagros Pita ( ) ,
Molly Sims ( Molly Sims ) ,
Monica Bellucci ( Monica Bellucci ) ,
Muna Hunt ( ) ,
Nadya Hutagalung ( ) ,
Namjoo Kim ( ) ,
Naomi Campbell ( ) ,
Natalia Estrada ( ) ,
Natalia Paris ( Natalia Paris ) ,
Natalie Imbruglia ( Natalie Imbruglia ) ,
Natasha Henstridge ( ) ,
Natsumi Abe ( ) ,
Natsumi Yokoyama ( ) ,
Nethra Raghuraman ( Nethra Raghuraman ) ,
Nia Long ( ) ,
Nicci Juice ( ) ,
Nicole - Luxembourg ( ) ,
Nieves Mallor ( ) ,
Niki Taylor ( ) ,
Nikki Cox ( ) ,
Nikki Visser ( ) ,
Noemi Lenoir ( ) ,
Olga Medina ( ) ,
Patricia Ford ( ) ,
Patricia Velasquez ( ) ,
Patricia Vasquez ( ) ,
Paula Andrea Betancur ( Paula Andrea Betancur ) ,
Paula Trickey ( Paula Trickey ) ,
Paulina Porizkova ( ) ,
Petra Schürmann ( Petra Schürmann , Petra Schürmann ) ,
Phaedra Hoste ( ) ,
Raquel Welch ( ) ,
Reiko Kato ( ) ,
Rhea Harder ( ) ,
Pooja Bhatt ( Pooja Bhatt ) ,
Rajlaxmi Khanvilkar(Roy ) ( Rajlaxmi Khanvilkar(Roy) ) ,
Rossana Redondo ( ) ,
Rosy - India ( Rosy ) ,
Sabrina Staubitz ( ) ,
Sally Richardson ( ) ,
Salma Hayek ( ) ,
Samantha Fox ( ) ,
Sandra Bullock ( ) ,
Saskia Valencia ( ) ,
Satomi Yoshida ( ) ,
Savka Polak ( ) ,
Serena Williams ( ) ,
Seungyun Lee ( ) ,
Shana Zadrick ( ) ,
Shania Twain ( ) ,
Sofia Franco ( ) ,
Sofia Vergara ( Sofia Vergara ) ,
Sonja Zietlow ( ) ,
Sonya Kraus ( ) ,
Soyoung Go ( ) ,
Soyoun Kim ( ) ,
Stacy Sanches ( ) ,
Suna Kim ( ) ,
Sung Hi Lee ( ) ,
Susan Ward ( ) ,
Sylvia Leifheit ( ) ,
Talisa Soto ( ) ,
Tamara Fytch ( ) ,
Tanga Moreau ( ) ,
Tasha Moto Cunha ( ) ,
Tatiana de los Rios ( ) ,
Teresa Lourenco ( ) ,
Teri Hatcher ( Tenney ) ( ) ,
Thalia Estabridis ( ) ,
Tia Carrere ( Tia Carrere ) ,
Tiffani-Amber Thiessen ( Tiffani-Amber Thiessen ) ,
Tina Kjaer ( ) ,
Tomomi Miyauchi ( ) ,
Toni Braxton ( ) ,
Tori Spelling ( Tori Spelling ) ,
Tracy Bingham ( ) ,
Tylene Buck ( ) ,
Tyra Banks ( Tyra Banks ) ,
Ursula Karven ( ) ,
Ursula Sarcev ( ) ,
Ursula Verastegui ( ) ,
Valeria Mazza ( ) ,
Vana Barba ( ) ,
Vanessa Angel ( ) ,
Vanessa Lorenzo ( ) ,
Vanessa Marcil ( ) ,
Vanna White ( ) ,
Varsha Usgaonkar ( Varsha Usgaonkar ) ,
Verona Feldbusch ( ) ,
Veronica Varekova ( ) ,
Veronica Ferres ( Veronica Ferres ) ,
Victoria Adams ( ) ,
Victoria Silvstedt ( ) ,
Victoria's Secret ( ) ,
Virginie LeDoyen ( Virginie LeDoyen ) ,
Viveka Babajee ( Viveka Babajee ) ,
Vivica Fox ( ) ,
Waluscha D'Souza ( Waluscha D'Souza ) ,
Yamila Diaz ( ) ,
Yasmeen Ghauri ( ) ,
Yuki Uchida ( ) ,
Yukta Mookhey ( Yukta Mookhey ) ,
Yvonne Reyes ( ) ,
Zella Baretta ( ) ,
Zoe Naylor ( ) .
To the following names, I have not put any links because the
photos
may be only for those who are 18- years _old- or - older :
Amy Russo, Aria Giovanni, Brandy Sanders, Donne Sole, Jana Cova, Jenna
Jameson, Laura Freddi, Matilde Brandi,
Minka, Moana Pozzi, Nikki Dial, Nikki Tyler ,Sky Lopez ,Stacy Moran,
Tera Patrick,Vicca of-Pent- house.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
19
Campaign money:
In the U.S.A. many people do think the main cause of the economic
decline
for the
majority of the population in the U.S.A. and the world and the
disappearing
middle
class is "campaign money" or are "campaign donations" or are
"campaign
contributions".
Politicians want to get elected and reelected and do need much money
for this . Therefore
they spend a large part of their time collecting money called campaign
contributions or
campaign money . Who does have so much money and does give that money
to them ?
They are big corporations , big banks , big insurance companies and
wealthy individuals
and a small part of the whole are trade unions. Trade unions in the
U.S. in e.g. the year 2000
do give only one seventh of the campaign money that others do give
.
This is done e.g. via PACs ( political action committes ) of
the different corporations
to individual politicians or as " soft money " to parties
.
An individual political candidate is not allowed to receive more than
U.S.$ 5000 from one
corporation per election , but there are loopholes , so one
single
company can pay much more
by what is called bundling . Some executives and employees of
this one company all pay
their maximum legal amount , so that one single company in practice
can pay much more
to one single political candidate . Even children aged 6 years
have been found to have
donated the maximum amount as a person , as one person is allowed
to donate only the
maximum legal amount , so the money has to be distributed to
different persons to be
donated legally . The above concerns individual political candidates
who formally are
allowed only to receive U.S. $ 5000 .
Political parties are allowed to receive an unlimited amount of money
. Many people
especially want to change this . E.g. before the pro big mergers
law The Telecommunications
Act of 1996 ( deregulation ) both parties in Congress were paid several
times $ 100000 or
more by companies benefiting from the law , the population now has
much less choice
because the owners determine what is allowed in television and
radio programs of these
merged television and radio stations ( fewer owners ) . Campaign
contributions to
congressional candidates by communications interests from 1987 to 1996
were more
than $ 60.6 million . As happens in the U.S.A. , some media
corporations
also do have
ownership in nuclear industry ( conglomeration ) , so no negative
reporting
about
nuclear energy allowed in the media of these corporations . Many
observers
agree that
especially since the last years almost only owners and advertisers
decide what the content
of the big media has to be regardless of the university education of
journalists because profit
has to be maximized . Thought of media reform in the U.S.A. is not
so frequent yet ,
because change of the media would be difficult .
At least until some years , politicans were also paid money by
the above donors for fact
finding trips to foreign capitals on other continents and for
conferences
at sea site resorts or
for lectures they had given , but I think this for some years now is
illegal ,
that is money has to be donated directly , not for some purpose
.
Why do big corporations , big banks , big insurance companies , wealthy
individuals and some
trade unions do give this money to politicians and parties ?
Do they give the money for charity ? Companies do have
to make a profit or they go
bankrupt if they are small , but big companies do get bailouts from
the government paid by
the taxpayers . People in the U.S.A. do say companies donate
money
for a return of investment ,
i.e. a small part of the expected profits caused by a new law is paid
as campaign money to
politicians . The politicans vote for laws which produce much of profit
for the donors of
the money and the politicians use the money , donated for the lawmaking
in favor of a
company , to get elected or reelected as politicians themselves
.
It is said that in the U.S. in about 96 % of the elections ,
the politican who use
the most camaign money , gets elected . I think that also has to do
with that the
the corporations who pay their favorite candidate so much money , also
have , by their
big money for ads in the media , a big influence on the media
which present the
favorite candidate of the corporations in the most favorable light
to the media
users , there is also issue advertising ( same opinion advertised as
the opinion of the
candidate ) .
The politicans use the donated money for television spots which in
the U.S.A. are
extremely expensive and also for consultants on how to do a
successful
election campaign .
Voters do not vote for candidates when they have never heard anything
about them
before and repetition ( more on this at affirmations in
part 1 of this website )
makes a choice for a politician a natural choice .
In the U.S.A. there is a so-called transparency of election campaign
money , also called
' the politician of glass ' meaning who can be looked through
financially. That is all
the money donated has to be publicly documented and can be looked up
by every U.S.
citizen . This was done after misuses of campaign money . In
other countries the above
money flow is kept secret , politicians say " We do not want the
politician
of glass like
in the U.S.A. " and only the IRS ( tax office ) must be informed
. In the U.S.A. the
money donated to a politician can be looked up and also it can be
looked
up who
donated that money .
In a book ( part 2 this website ) Cecil Heftel who was a
Congressman
representing Hawaii
from 1976 to 1986 writes about his own experiences and his ideas about
campaign
finance reform and about lobbying reform .
In a book ( part 2 this website ) Charles Lewis and many people
of the Center for Public
Integrity show in very details how campaign money is determining which
laws are passed
and how these laws influence the population of the U.S.A. in almost
every aspect of
their life .
Who has much money and who donates much money has a strong
influence
on which
laws are made and passed and enforced .
Only few ( e.g. 4% ) of the U.S citizens pay any donation
to any politician or party at
all and only about 9000 people in the U.S:A.are said to pay more
than $ 1000 for an
election .
Politicians want to make a career like people in other
professions
do and are not more
greedy than others . Big companies want to make a big profit . There
is nothing illegal with
it . However the big majority of the population who does not by far
has so much money to
pay campaign money has disadvantages in every aspect of life because
of it . So there
should be a reform ( democracy ) . But the big question is how to make
such a
reform .
There are often discussions in the U.S. Congress on the role of
campaign
money and how to
reform this campaign money practice . Sometimes the U.S. President
and sometimes the
leader of the majority in Congress are making proposals and then
again back off .
Also in September 1999 there was a vote in the House of Congress
narrowly
in favor
of campaign finance reform , but the same law was defeated in the
Senate
in October 1999
so on the federal level for the time being the past practice will be
continued .
How can such a problem be solved ?
Since about 1990 the U.S. Democrats ( called since then
the ' New Democrats ' ) have
like the Republicans before relied solely on campaign contributions
to win ( Presidential )
elections and no longer on labor , women , minorities ( doing
what the ones , who
pay most , want , perceived as the only chance to win elections in
the future ) .
Public elections should be publicly financed to avoid bribery and
corruption
.
For U.S. Presidential election there is a a modest public
financing
, but not for the primaries
before the Presidential elections where the candidates for the
Presidential
election are
assessed on how many votes they might get which influences
strongly
who will be the final
candidates ; also there is the soft money ( campaign money for
the parties ) .
During recent years many U. S. States have passed campaign finance
reforms or are in
the process passing campaign finance reform .
Without the present role of campaign money , many things would have
happened differently :
law making and law enforcement :
no NAFTA and no bailout of Mexico afterwards , no introduction of
regressive
taxes instead
of progressive taxes ( meaning big companies and rich individuals some
decades ago paid
much more of the taxes of a country ) , and no globalization of the
economy , no WTO
(what formerly decided by governments of a country , now decided
secretly
by
representatives of big corporations , on e.g. health , environment
, employment ) ,
no big mergers and not very many other things ( e.g.
book
by Charles Lewis in part 2 of this website ) .
LEGAL campaign money in the U.S. is often called legal bribery ,
legalized
bribery ,
legal corruption or legalized corruption . Many people do say that
both legal and
illegal campaign money is bribery and corruption . To avoid
this bribery and corruption ,
public elections must be publicly financed . Certainly the big
corporations
would not
like to pay their campaign money as taxes to the state instead which
would use the money
to publicly finance the election campaigns , so there would be no
bribery
and
corruption effect . Legal and illegal campaign money is paid
only because of the expected
return on investment which is much higher than the campaign money
itself . Political campaigns
must be financed , but to avoid illegal and legal bribery and
corruption
, public elections
must be publicly financed . Also politicians would not need to spend
such a large part of their
time to collect campaign money for the next election.
I do not understand why corporations do keep their big campaign money
contributions illegally
secret because of a possible bad impression of bribery and corruption
, all is needed are
cooperating media which do not mention the big legal compaign money
at all or only
very rarely and inconspicuously on e.g. page 23 of a newspaper in the
middle of the page
inconspicuously , so almost no person remembers later on .
In the U.S. the problem of LEGALl campaign contributions to
political
parties is a frequent topic
in the media. In Western Europe, e.g. in Germany, LEGAL campaign
contributions
to political parties
are a big taboo in the media. In Western Euope the mainstream media
often report much on
ILLEGAL campaign contributions to political parties. These campaign
contributions are ILLEGAL when
they are higher than a certain amount of money and they are not
published
( called 'declared' ) in
one newspaper which is read only by very few people. Campaign
contributions
to political parties
are LEGAL, when they are more than a certain amount of money and
published
( declared ) in one
small newspaper or are smaller than that amount of money. It seems
to me that these media campaigns
of the ILLEGAL campaign contributions are only there to deflect
attention
of the public from the
very serious problem of the LEGAL campaign contribution (
millions
of EUROS from big corporations
and big banks and the very rich ) to political parties, which in the
U.S. are called LEGAL bribery and
LEGAL corruption. The big problem are the LEGAL ( not the ILLEGAL
) millions of campaign money
contributions from big corporations, big banks, big financial
institutions,
billionaires and millionaires to political
parties and politicians. Political elections must be financed by the
state from taxpayer money and not by
campaign contributions from big corporations, big banks, big financial
institutions, and very rich individuals.
Else politicans make laws and regulations for the big corporations
and very rich individuals to reward the
campaign contributions. This is a constant topic in the U.S. media,
but a big taboo in the Western European
media. Two person ( corporate lobbyist and politician ) make an
agreement
for their advantage and the
disadvantage of a third person not present ( population ). Big
corporations
have become so powerful
that they always take more money for themselves at the cost of the
population.
In the U.S. some members of Congress do show on their web site
all their voting records of e.g.
the last four years , that is which laws they voted for and which laws
they voted against . Why do not
all members of Congress and in other countries all members of
parliaments do publish their voting records
on their website ? That would be much more honest for voters than the
public relations ( also called
propaganda ) often wrong promises of what they ( incumbents ) would
do when they would be elected .
The wrong U.S. President in 2000:
I think concerning the U.S. presidential elections in 2000 , that in
any other country of
the world the presidential elections in a state like Florida
would have been repeated
without much thought about it. Why are these defective voting machines
regarded as more
important than what the population wants ? Also big numbers of voters
with a legal right to
vote were not allowed to vote in this election in Florida. Had these
voters been allowed to
vote, the present U.S. president ( e.g. during the years 2002
and 2003 ) would be a
different U.S. president, because the not allowed voters with a legal
right to vote were
mostly African Americans who almost all vote for the Democrativ party.
This is the reason
why sometimes one does find the expression "the unelected president".
In any other country of the world, the election in the state of Florida
would have been
repeated without the defective machines, i.e. simply with BALLOT PAPERS
as being
done for more than a century. Theses ballot papers can be printed in
a short time in
almost any country. The U.S. courts do not seem to be independent
enough
of political
parties ( not enough separation of the executive power from the
judicial power ).
As so many politicians from Europe watched the U.S. presidential
elections
2000 on
the Internet for imitation in Europe , will this kind of Florida
election also be repeated
in Europe in the future ?
The
wrong
U.S.
President
again
in
2004?:
It seems that in the 2004 U.S. presidential election there was major
fraud, because the owners of the
voting machines ( favoring the Republiacan Party ) had their
programmers
of the voting machines write
programs that changed a larger part of the votes for the the
Democratic Party into a vote for the Republican
Party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12
*
In the year 2000, I was still using the Microsoft Windows 98
operating
system ,
but in the future I intended to use the Linux system , but I have
tested
some Linux
operating systems and have found that also in the year 2000 there
are compatibility
problems with computer graphic cards , system files of the
Windows
98
operating system ( also when there are different partitions ) and
modems
.
Many years ago I did do much shareware testing and found that
some programs
did run only on the computer of the programmer , but not on my computer
.
Linux programmers like to program very many new programs , when what
is necessary instead is the making compatible of the Linus operating
systems .
There must be beta versions of the Linux operating system before the
final version and this
beta versions must be tested all over the world with different
computers
and
graphic cards and modems and there must be constant improvement
as with
what the Japanese call kaizen .
GEZ
will auch für Computer abkassieren ( weitere Abzocke per
Gesetz ) , link
1a , link
1b , link
2 , link
3 , link
4 ,
link 5
,
link
6 , link
7 , link 8
, link
9 , link 10
, link 11
, link 12
, link
13 , link
14ver.di , link 15
,
Why
German public broadcasting should be privatized: Else no international
competitiveness.
Will
lawsuits privatize German 'public' radio until 2007?
Where
are the big corporations which want to privatize almost eyerything?
Radio and Television in Germany:
Also in GERMANY now there are many commercial radio and TV stations.
Also the former public
radio and TV stations are getting more and more commercial , e.g.
before
every newscast there are
commercial ads for buying goods of some big corporations , i.e. German
public radio/TV and
commercial radio/TV are becoming more and more alike like in the U.S.
However in Germany public
radio and TV has to be paid by fees from the population, if they do
see and listen to the public radio
and TV stations or not, in addition to the money the public
broadcasting
gets from the ads. Fees
have to be paid for the ownership of a radio set and/or for the
ownership
of a TV set and all this
money is given the public(-commercial) broadcast companies. Also
people who never do listen
to / never watch public(-commercial) radio and TV have to pay
the public(-private) broadcast
stations by fees. The directors of public(-commercial) radio and TV
are always thinking how they
can expand ( enlarge ) their programs by new channels , e.g.
a new channel for debates from
parliaments or a new channel with only news. They think there is no
limit on how much they can
raise the fees.
In addition because of the federal nature of German public(-commercial)
radio there are about
8 public(-commercial) radio companies in the different federal states,
with each company having
about 5 different radio programs. Many people do consider the federal
nature of radio/TV in
Germany a very big waste. Why is there not only one company with some
regional
channels?
Now the broadcast directors of public(-private) broadcasting have
discovered
the
Internet meaning they want to get fees from all Internet users in
Germany
because
the Internet users could use their programs though most users never
do .
No one has thought of creating a password for radio and TV
stations
users who
might only be able to use their broadcasts when they do have a valid
password .
Why not pay according to hours listened and watched? Who would pay
the high
fees of Internet providers to be entertained by public(-private) TV?
However the broadcast directors do not want passwords for access to
their broadcast
programs because they want as much money as they can get . The bigger
the
organization of the broadcast directors , the higher the income
they can get . They
have completely forgetten that in addition to the commercial radio
and TV and the
public(-commercial) radio and TV there also should be a third
non-commercial
free radio micro radio ( up to 100 watts output each station ) as
mentioned
above
for which people would like to give donations or fees to get
non-commercial
programs ( like e.g. in the U.S. ) . The thirst for money of the
public(-private)
broadcasting
is taking money away from companies in the Internet , because fewer
people are using
the Internet because of the broadcast fees . The debate is done in
a legalistic way , e.g.
on what the definition of public broadcasting is like (
August 2000 ) .
The German law says that public radio is only for the essential radio
and TV service
( Grundversorgung ) , but the broadcast directors do not care, i.e.
the bigger the more
money is earned.
People who do not spend their time only to be entertained, often do
not use radio for
more than a few minutes a day and very rarely do read newspapers which
also is a big
waste of time. Books and Internet surfing are much more informative
and specific than
radio and TV and newspapers for the general public, but the
public(-private)
broadcast directors want the quickest highest profits for themselves
and the
population does have the disadvantage.
I think the German public broadcasting should be without commercial
ads, be a
much smaller organization, should be a national and not a federal
radio/TV
company,
be paid publicly by the state and that there should be very many
non-commercial
,
free radio, micro radio stations .
I am for public payment of the public broadcasting costs , because
now I think - for about 25
years , each year - I and very many other people do get a letter to
send a letter back that I am
using only a radio set and no TV set and I keep telling them if I would
get a TV set I would
of course according to the German law report it to them, but they keep
sending this letter
every year for about 25 years as if the whole German
population
were lawless and acted
according to law only if they are carefully controlled .
"You are paying for a radio. Do you also illegally use a TV. And they
threaten each year with a
fine, if I would not answer".
They do tell me that there are many people who do not pay the TV fees
though they do own a
TV and I keep telling them that nevertheless one cannot use any means
to reach a goal , i.e. get
as much money as one can get .
IN THE FUTURE, EVERY PERSON IN GERMANY WHO DOES USE
THE INTERNET ( Analog ) ( SURF , CHAT ) HAS TO PAY EACH
MONTH 17.03 EURO TO
THE PUBLIC(-COMMERCIAL) GERMAN TELEVISION COMPANIES. THIS IN
EFFECT IS A HIGH IMPORT TAX FOR GERMANY. THE EURO MAKES IT EASY
TO COMPARE THE SITUATION WITH OTHER COUNTRIES.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radio and Television:
Many people in the U.S. want local low power NON-commercial FREE
RADIO stations
which are cheap to build and have a large audience because the big
media giants
( the pro big mergers Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) do no longer
have radio programs
for the non-wealthy because the big commercial media have to satisfy
their advertisers
who want radio and TV programs only for the wealthy because from them
they can earn
the most money .Maybe the FCC is changing its policy sometime
in the future to give
the population what they want .
Formerly there were also labor reports in the big media of the U.S.A.
on e.g. the
conditions at the place of work , but now no longer . Instead
of the labor pages , now
there are additional business pages on e.g. where and how to invest
for big investors .
An own experience of the business climate in the U.S. media :
Years ago being in Europe , for many years I did read
U.S. business books and
business magazines and listened to U.S. business audio tapes
. As a result
emotionally but not intellectually I had the feeling and impression
that EVERY U.S.
citizen in the U.S.A. was a billionaire or a millionaire
who was always on the
lookout for some additional opportunity to make another million bucks
( dollars ) .
The only exception to this were a few U.S. citizens who were alcoholics
and therefore
were not billionaires and millionaires .
There are so many corporate channels , why not have one 24 hours radio
and TV LABOR channel
and one 24 hours radio and TV STUDENT channel and a 24 hours
radio and TV CONSUMER channel
for consumers to buy in groups ? In the 1940s in the U.S. there was
a radio station "Voice of Labor" .
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I heard a story : A father and his young little son are
going
from one village to another
village with their donkey . First the father sits on the donkey . The
first passerby complains :
" The father sits on the donkey and the poor little son has to walk
." Then the little son sits
on the donkey and the father walks beside the donkey . The second
passerby
complains :
" The little son sits on the donkey and the poor father has to walk
." Then both father and
son sit on the donkey . The next passerby complains : " The poor donkey
has to carry a
too heavy weight because both father and son sit on the donkey . "
Then both father and
son walk . The next passerby complains : " These people
own a donkey but do not
use him for riding ".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Details on myself are now at "the author of this website" on Part 2c of this website.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 1 Part 1a Part 1b Part 1c Part 1d Part 2 Part 2a Part 2b Part 2c Part 3